Successful Osseointegration and Implant Surfaces

/Home/Dental Implants (Prosthodontics)/Dental Implants (Prosthodontics)Articles & Reports/Group 5

Successful Osseointegration and Implant Surfaces
Melinda Mo DDS 2004
Comptom Implants
Please visit the web site to view the article in its entirety.
Introduction:
Osseointegration is the basis of a successful endosseous implant. The process itself is quite complex and there are many factors that influence the formation and maintenance of bone at the implant surface. What characteristics does an implant surface need to possess in order for success? To more fully understand what influences osseointegration, it is important first to examine more closely the interface, the traits of a surface that allow for biocompatibility, and the common surfaces used and studied such as titanium oxide and hydroxyapatite.
References:
1. Erricsson I, Johansson CB, Bystedt H, Norton MR. A histomorphometric evaluation of bone-to-implant contact on machine-prepared and roughened titanium dental implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 1994;52:775-787.
2. Inadome T. Hayashi K. Nakashima Y, Stsumura H, Sugioka Y. Comparison of bone-implant interface share strength of hydroxyapatite-coated and alumina-coated metal implants. J.Biomed Mater Res 1995;29:19-24
3. Rubin CT. McLoed KJ. Promotion of bony ingrwoth by frequency-specific, low amplitude mechanical strain. Clin Orthop 1994;298:165-174.
4. Garetti Kom Chen J, Parr JA, Roberts WE. Remodeling dynamics of bone supporting rigidly fixed titanium implants: A histomorphometric comparison in four species including humans. Implant Dent 1995;4:235-243.
5. De Lange G, de Putter C. Structure of the bone interface to dental implants in vivo. J Oral Implantol 1993;19:123-135.
6. De Lange GL, de Putter C, de Wijs FLJA. Histological and ultrastructural appearance of the hydroxyapatite-bone interface. J. Biomed Materials Res 1990;24:829-845.
7. Clokie CML, Warshawky H. Morphologic and radioauto-graphic studies of bone formation in relation to titanium implants using rat tibia as a model. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1995;10:155-165.
8. Nanci A, McCarthy GF. Zalzal S, Clokie CML, Warshawsky H, McKee MD. Tissue response to titanium implants in the rat tibia: Ultrastructural, immunocytochemical and lectin-cytochemical characterization of the bone-titanium interface. Cells and Materials 1994;4:1-30.
9. Kawaguchi H. McKee MD. Okamoto H. Nanci A. Immunocytochemical and lectin-gold characterization of the interface between alveolar bone and implanted hydroxyapetite in the rate. Cells Materials 1993;3:337-358.
10. Bobyn JD. Pilliar RM, Cameron HU. Weatherly GC. The optimum ore size fot he fixation of porous surfaced metal implants by the ingrowth of bone. Clin Orthop 1990;5:314-319.
11. Thomas KA, Cook SD. An evaluation of variables influencing implant fixation by direct bone apposition. J Biomed Mater Res 1985; 19:875-901.
12. Carlsson L. Rostlund T. Albrektsson B. Albrektsson T. Removal Torques for polished and rough titanium implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1988;3:21-24.
13. Carlsson L, Rostlund T. Albrektsson B, Albrektsson T. Removal Torques for polished and rough Titanium implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1988; 2:21-24.
14. Gila FJ, Padrosb A. Maneroa JM. Et al. Growth of bioactive surfaces on titanium and its alloys for orthopaedic and dental implants. Universidad Politecnica de Cataluna, Barcelona Spain. 2001.
15. T. Kokubo, F. Miyaji and h. M Kim, Spontaneous formation fo bonelike apatite layer on chemically treated titanium metals. J. Am. Ceram Soc. 79 (1996) : 1127-1129.
16. Gotfredesn K, Nimb L. Hjorting ǃÏHansen E, Jensen JS. Holmen A. Histomorphometric and removal torque analysis for Ti02-blasted titanium implants. An experimental study on dogs. Clin Oral Implants Res 1992;3:77-84.
17. Wennenberg A, Albrektsson T, Johansson C, Andersson B. Experimental study of turned and grit-blasted screw shaped implants with special emphasis on effects of blasting materials and surface topography. Biomaterials 1996;17:15-22.
18. Wennenberg A. Albrektsson B., Albrektsson T., Andersson B. Histomorphometric removal torque study of screw-shaped implants with three different surface topographies. Clin Oral Implants Res 1996;6:24-30.
19. Misch C. Implant Dentistry.
20. Hench LL, Clar AE; Adhesion to bone. In Williams DF, edtor: Biocompatibility of Orthopaedic implants, vol 2, Boca raton, Fla, 1982, CRC Press.
21. Kirsch A; The two phase implantation method using IMZ intramobile cylinder implant. J. Oral Implantol 11(2); 197-210, 1983.
22. Young FA, Spector M, Kresch CH: Porous Titanium endosseous dental implants in Rhesus monkeys : microradiography and histological evaluation. J Biomed Mater Res 13:843-856,1979.
23. Schroeder A, Van der Zypen E, Stich et al. The reactions of bone, connective tissue and epithelium to endosteal implants with titanium sprayed surfaces. J Maxillofac Surg. 9;15-25,1981.
24. Maniatopoulos C, Pilliar RM, Smith DC; Threaded vs porous surface designs for stablilization in bone-endodontic implant model.J Biomed Mater Res 20: 1309-1333, 1986.
25. Pilliar RM, Lee J, Maniatopoulos C: Observations on the effect of movement on bone in growth into porous surface implants, Clin Orthop 208: 108-113,1986.
26. Moser W, Netnwig Gh: Zur problematic von titan-spritzbeschich-tungen, Z Zahnarzil Implantol 3:282-285,1987.
27. Watzek G, Danhel-Mayhauser M, Matejka M et al: Experimental comparison of Branemakr and TPS dental implants in sheep model, abstract 50, Presented at the UCLA Symposium on Implants in the Partially Edentulous Patient Palm Springs, Ca, 1990.
28. Block MS, Kent JN, Kay JF: Evaluation of hydroxylapatite-coated titanium dental implants in dogs, J Oral Maxillofac Surg 45:601-607, 1987.
29. Thomas kA, Kay JF, Cook SD et al : Effect of surface microstructure and hydroxylapatite coating on the mechanical strengths and histologic profiles of titanium implantmaterials, J Biomed Mater Res 21 (12):1395-1414, 1987.
30. Thomask KA, Jay JF, Cook SD et al, The effect of surface macrotexture on hydroxylapatite coating on the mechaical strengths and histologic profiles of titanium implantmaterials. J Biomed Mater Res 21:1395-1414,1987.
31. Lemons JE: Biomaterial considerations for dental implants, Part I: metal and alloys, Alabama Academy of General Dentistry Sponsored Symposium on Dental Implants, J Oral Impl, 4:503-515, 1975.
32. Skalak R: Biomechanical considerations in osseointegrated prostheses. J Prosteth Dent 49 (6): 843-848, 1983.
33. Spector M, Biocompatibility in orthopedic implants. In Williams DF, Editor: Biocompatibility of materials, Boca Raton, Fla, 1984, CRC Press.
34. Takayuki M, Paula K. Felton D, Cooper L. Generalizations Regarding the Process and Phenomenon of Osseointegration. Part I. In Vivo Studies. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1998;13:17-29.
35. Lacefield W, Compton K, Machado C. Abrasion of Ceramic and Metallic Implant Coatings inserted into Bone.
36. Takayuki M, Cooper L, Paula K, Felton D, Generalizations Regarding the Process and Phenomenon of Osseointegration. Part II. In Vitro Studies.