Screw Loosening for Standard and Wide Diameter Implants in Partially Edentulous Cases: 3- to 7-Year Longitudinal Data

Screw Loosening for Standard and Wide Diameter Implants in Partially Edentulous Cases: 3- to 7-Year Longitudinal Data
September 2004
Cho, Sang-Choon DDS; Small, Paula-Naomi DDS, MPH; Elian, Nicolas DDS; Tarnow, Dennis DDS
Implant Dentistry: Volume 13(3) September 2004 pp 245-250
Please visit the web site to view the article in its entirety.
Abstract
Screw loosening is considered to be a common problem with both screw - retained and cemented implant restorations. A wider abutment platform, as well as using a torque driver to tighten specifically designed screws may help prevent this loosening. However, there has been no clinical study evaluating either of these. To longitudinally compare the frequency of screw loosening in standard diameter, (3.75 and 4.0 mm) implant supported prostheses to that of wide diameter, (5.0 and 6.0 mm) implant supported prostheses that were hand tightened, and to evaluate whether using a torque driver would minimize or prevent this problem, if screw loosening occurred. A total of 213 dental implants in 106 patients were included in this prospective longitudinal study. Of the implants 68 were wide diameter and 145 were standard diameter implants. Wide diameter implants showed 5.8% screw loosening, while standard diameter implants showed 14.5% screw loosening after insertion with only hand torquing. When these loose screws were tightened with a torque driver, there was no more loosening of screws. Within the limitations of this study, the wide diameter implants tested showed less screw loosening than the standard diameter implants when hand torqued. Additionally, within the scope of our study, using a torque driver to tighten the screws with the recommended force prevented this loosening from reoccurring in all cases.
References
1. Zarb G, Schmitt A. The longitudinal clinical effectiveness of osseointegrated dental implants: the Toronto study. Part III: problems and complications encountered. J Prosthet Dent. 1990;64:185-194.
2. Goodacre CJ, Kan JYK, Rungcharassaeng K. Clinical complications of osseointegrated implants. J Prosthet Dent. 1999;81:537-552.
3. Jemt T, Book K, Linden B, et al. Failures and complications in 92 consecutively inserted overdentures supported by Branemark implants in severely resorbed edentulous maxillae: a study from prosthetic treatment to first annual check-up. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1992;7:162-167.
4. Naert I, Quirynen M, van Steenberghe D, et al. A study of 589 consecutive implants supporting complete fixed pros-theses. Part II: prosthetic aspects. J Prosthet Dent. 1992;68:949-956.
5. Kallus T, Bessing C. Loose gold screws frequently occur in full-arch fixed prostheses supported by osseointegrated implants after 5 years. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1994;9:169-178.
6. Jemt T, Laney WR, Harris D, et al. Osseointegrated implants for single tooth replacement: a 1-year report from a multi-center prospective study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1991;6:29-36.
7. Becker W, Becker BE. Replacement of maxillary and mandibular molars with single endosseous implant restorations: a retrospective study. J Prosthet Dent. 1995;74:51-55.
8. Lazzara R, Siddiqui AA, Binon P, et al. Retrospective multicenter analysis of 3i endosseous dental implants placed over a five-year period. Clin Oral Implants Res. 1996;7:73-83.
8a. McGlumphy EA. Keeping implant screws tight: the solution. J Dent Symposia. 1993;1:20-23.
9. Binon P. Evaluation of the effectiveness of a technique to prevent screw-loosening. J Prosthet Dent. 1998;79:430-432.
10. McGlumphy E, Mendel D, Holloway J. Implant screw mechanics. Dent Clin North Am. 1998;42:71-89.
11. Hurson S. Laboratory techniques to prevent screw-loosening on dental implants. J Dent Technology. 1996;13:30-37.
12. Graves SL, Jansen CE, Saddiqui AA, et al. Wide diameter implants: indications, considerations and preliminary results over a two-year period. Aust Prosth J. 1994;8:31-37.
13. Vogel RE, Davliakos JP. Spline(TM) implant prospective multicenter study: interim report on prosthetic screw stability in partially edentulous patients. J Esthetic Dent. 2002;14:225-237.
14. Langer B, Langer L, Herrmann I, et al. The wide fixture: a solution for special situations and a rescue for the compromised implant. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1993;8:400-408.
15. Aboyoussef H, Weiner S, Ehrenberg D. Effect of an antirotation resistance form on screw-loosening for single implant-supported crowns. J Prosthet Dent. 2000; 83:450-455.