Onset and duration periods of articaine and lidocaine on maxillary infiltration
Note: You will need to copy and paste the URL in a browser window to view the abstract online.

http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=ArticleListURL&_method=list&_ArticleListID=638291158&_sort=d&_acct=C000050221&_version=1&_urlVersion=0&_userid=10&md5=072ab7aa4a9d3789ffb5ea91016406f8&view=f

You can view the abstract online. A subscription is required to view the full text or it can be purchased online.

Onset and duration periods of articaine and lidocaine on maxillary infiltration
The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, Volume 94, Issue 4, October 2005, Page 381
C.G. Costa, I.P. Tortamano, R.G. Rocha, C.E. Francischone and N. Tortamano

Objectives
The aim of this study was to compare the onset and duration of pulpal anesthesia by maxillary infiltration using 2% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine, 4% articaine with 1:200,000 epinephrine, and 4% articaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine.
Method and Materials

Twenty healthy patients randomly received 1.8 mL of one of the three local anesthetics during operative dentistry procedures of low complexity on three maxillary posterior teeth. Onset and duration were determined using an electric pulp tester.
Results

The mean values for pulpal onset were 2.8, 1.6, and 1.4 minutes and for pulpal duration were 39.2, 56.7, and 66.3 minutes, respectively, for 2% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine, 4% articaine with 1:200,000 epinephrine, and 4% articaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine. Statistical analysis by the Kruskal-Wallis nonparametric test showed significant differences with better results (shorter onset and longer duration periods) for both articaine solutions compared with the lidocaine solution. Although 4% articaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine clinically presented the shortest onset and the longest duration periods, there was no statistically significant difference between the articaine solutions.
Conclusion

Both articaine solutions produced shorter onset and longer duration of pulpal anesthesia by maxillary infiltration than the lidocaine solution did. Statistical analysis did not confirm better clinical results of 4% articaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine than with 4% articaine with 1:200,000 epinephrine.ŪReprinted with permission of Quintessence Publishing.

Copyright © 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. ScienceDirect? is a registered trademark of Elsevier B.V.
Comments: 0
Votes:0